that said, and reading to @sorenpeter and @andros I have new thoughts. I assume that this won't change anyone's opinions or priorities, so it makes no harm sharing them.

It's always tempting to use something that already exists (like X, Masto, Bsky, etc.) rather that building anything through effort and disagreement until reaching to something useful and valuable together. A 'social service' is only useful if people is using it.

I'll add that I haven't lost interest on the 'hacky' part of twtxt about developing tools, protocols, and extensions as a community. It's the appealing part! It's a nice hobby to have, shared with random people across the world. But this is not the right way for me, and makes me feel that I'm unwelcome to propose something different (after watching replies to my previous twt). Feels like "If you don't agree, you are free to leave, we'll miss you." Naah, not cool. I've lived that many times before, and nowadays I don't have enough spare time and energy for a hobby like that.

Let's see what happens next with the micro-community!

just for the record I didn't say I was leaving the twtxt 'community' (did I?) but than I have other priorities to focus on in the following months. Please don't be condescending, is not cool.

Development of Timeline (PHP client) has been stale for some reasons, a few of them in my side, so I think it won't be updated to the new thread model, at least pretty soon. So is not that I'll stop using twtxt, just the client I use won't be compatible with the new model in July.

July 1st. 63 days from now to implement a backward-incompatible change, apparently not open to other ideas like replacing blake with SHA, or discussing implementation challenges for other languages and platforms. Finally just closing #18, #19 and #20 without starting a proper discussion and ignoring a 'micro consensus' feels... not right.

I don't know what to think rather than letting it rest (May will be busy here) and focus on other stuff in the future.

twt-hash-v2.md#implementation-timeline

hehe, just catching up on this thread! I've replied in another that using periods/dots sounds good to me as it's usual in domains, but perhaps some agreement would be needed. For now I think any character is valid as long as it is not a space. For example we are using this for PHP twtxt.php#L153

ok! sorry, somehow I'm getting lost in the replies.

on timeline the mention looks OK. Is there an issue on Yarn?

It's an interesting topic. For example on Bsky it's natural to allow domains https://bsky.social/about/blog/4-28-2023-domain-handle-tutorial

Although TwiXter only allows (letters A-Z, numbers 0-9 and of underscores) https://help.x.com/en/managing-your-account/x-username-rules

by commenting out DMs are you giving up on simplicity? See the Metadata extension holding the data inside comments, as the client doesn't need to show it inside the timeline.

I don't think that commenting out DMs as we are doing for metadata is giving up on simplicity (it's a feature already), and it helps to hide unwanted DMs to clients that will take months to add it's support to something named... an extension.

For some other extensions in https://twtxt.dev/extensions.html (for example the reply-to hash <a href="?search=abcdfeg" class="tag">#abcdfeg</a> or the mention @ < example http://example.org/twtxt.txt >) is not a big deal. The twt is still understandable in plain text. For DM, it's only interesting for you if you are the recipient, otherwise you see an scrambled message like 1234567890abcdef=. Even if you see it, you'll need some decryption to read it. I've said before that DMs shouldn't be in the same section that the timeline as it's confusing.

So my point stands, and as I've said before, we are discussing it as a community, so let's see what other maintainers add to the convo.

@andros I give you not creating another file, but then I'd vote for commenting out DMs. See https://eapl.me/timeline/post/z5e2bna

It's easier to find the DM in comments from your side, than asking all the client maintainers to add the regex =P You can even use a Modified comment, such as #! <DM content> Or something like that

This approach is retro-compatible with current and older clients.

just a note that we are doing that on PHP: https://github.com/eapl-gemugami/twtxt-php/blob/master/docs/03-hash-extension.md#php-72

That PHP snippet could be merged into https://twtxt.dev/exts/twt-hash.html

it should be `# 2025-04-13T11:02:12+02:00