@prologic You can read more about the "cryptic" live coding language Punctual in my newsletter

@prologic it says in the linked page;)

@andros You seem to be a bit ahead of your time: https://darch.dk/timeline/conv/jl2mf2a

Yes it seem to work(ish) on timeline at least: https://darch.dk/timeline/post/imopblq

@bender My point was that the suggested syntax for extending mentions to point to a specific message (<a href="/timeline/profile?url=url timestamp">@nick</a>) and having location based treading this way, might not break older clients, since they might just igonore the last value within the brackets.

@andros About the URL, since it no longer used for hashing there might be no need to change it. I agree that we keep all the parts that already are out there for the most parts. Instead of a contact field you could also just use links like: link = Email mailto:user@example.dk or link = Signal https://signal.me/sthF4raI5Lg_ybpJwB1sOptDla4oU7p[...]

@andros Thanks for consolidating a lot of good ideas. Especially how you have deiced to just extend the mention syntax for location-based treads. This might even be backward compatible with older (pre-yarn) clients. What about using Z for UTC +00:00- is that allowed in your specs? Regarding url = I would suggest to only allow one and the maybe add url_old = or url_alt = !? I'm still not a fan of a DM feature, even thou it helps that i have now been split out into a separate feed file. Instead if would suggest a contact = field for where people can put an email or other id/link for an established chat protocol like signal or matrix.

@movq I didn't say I was leaving, just not that active here atm. I might be more active on mastodon at https://norrebro.space/@sorenpeter but I'm also rethinking that too tbh.

I'm with @andros and @eapl.me on this one. But I have also lost interest in twtxt lately and currently rethinking what digital tools truly add value to my life. So I will not spending my time on adding more complexity to Timeline. Still a big thanks to you @prologic for all the great work you have done and all the nice conversations both here and on our video calls.

@prologic it was not an edit but a double posting