søren peter mørch

Conversation

Recent posts in reply to #2ymkryq

movq@www.uninformativ.de
I’ve been using DuckDuckGo for years now, worked fine. Today it’s down – and now I’m learning that it runs on Bing? 😳

https://www.searchenginemap.com/

Why do I keep getting hits by a DuckDuckBot then?

```
www.uninformativ.de 20.191.45.212 - - [23/May/2024:03:00:48 +0200] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 659 "http://www.uninformativ.de/" "DuckDuckBot/1.1; (+http://duckduckgo.com/duckduckbot.html)"
```
Read replies 3 months ago
movq@www.uninformativ.de
@prologic I wasn’t aware of the extent. 😞 The whole thing is down now that Bing is down.
In reply to: #2ymkryq 3 months ago
movq@www.uninformativ.de
@prologic Going to be interesting to find out what caused this. 🤔 Bing (like, the real bing.com) is still down for me as well.

DuckDuckGo’s help page doesn’t really make it clear that they rely on Bing *that much*:

https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/results/sources/

I guess this outage is a good thing. 😅 Lots of people now read up on this.
In reply to: #2ymkryq 3 months ago
bender@twtxt.net
@movq I will take this as pretty clear:

> "we have more traditional **links** and images in our search results too, which we largely source from Bing"

Emphasis mine. Of course, they could have spelled "links" as "results". We all know that was done purposely. 😅
In reply to: #2ymkryq 3 months ago
lyse@lyse.isobeef.org
@movq @prologic @bender Oh, I neither noticed the DDG downtime nor was I aware of their partnership with Bing. O_o Oh dear! Never heard of most search engines in this linked graph.
In reply to: #2ymkryq 3 months ago
movq@www.uninformativ.de
@bender In retrospect, it looks pretty obvious, yeah. 🫤 Or at least like a red flag.
In reply to: #2ymkryq 3 months ago
Comment via email